Author Topic: The GabCast  (Read 723 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #105 on: February 05, 2020, 12:51:21 am »
As to "Medicare for all" a few thoughts...

What Medicare has going for it sums to single payer coverage and affordability.

How it achieves those is by constraining its coverage to those over the age of 65 and subsidizing the low payments physicians must accept from other pools.

Open it up to all (especially illegal aliens) and the failure will be massive as no underlying subsidy from those already in the private care system will exist. Already the predicted lifespan of the trust fund is down to 10 years. :-\

https://www.theblaze.com/contributions/why-sanders-medicare-for-all-will-fail

The thing that has confounded me during the entire debacle of Obamacare and now this latest parry at universal coverage is how studiously the auto insurance decentralized model is ignored. Oh sure, no one wants to be on Dairyland grade coverage, but that's a safety net emergency actuary calculation to be parsed, one not best squared by an expansion of Medicare.

My observation is that government is rarely the most efficient provider, but it remains a valid check and balance on the free market model. Far better we fix/improve that than just toss it out.

 8)

Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #106 on: February 18, 2020, 06:30:45 pm »
So, despite MV's decision NOT to participate in the semi-annular "Let's Stalk Heather Off The Air Again" cyberbullying festival you've decided to pair up with the abortionist vermin for some perhaps un-prosecutable (based upon your respective nationalities) group shunning after all?

Wow.

Quote
3
Radio and Podcasts / Re: The GabCast (22nd February Edition)
« on: Today at 08:10:35 AM »
Just checking in to see if we're still good to go for this upcoming weekend's bumper fun extravaganza: I know Dynamo Hum and I are psyched.

Well, I've done my best to caution otherwise, alas to no avail.

Why do you think MV bailed at the last minute on the hot pariah action he and Heidi instigated?

Quote
Liberace!
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #19042 on: February 16, 2020, 09:16:46 PM »
Quote from: Lilith on February 16, 2020, 01:53:19 PM

Jesus.  You know what?  This upcoming GabCast which is set to air just prior to Heather coming back... I'm not doing it.  If anyone else wants to host it I can run the board and put you on the stream, but I'm not going to be on it.  I can't begin to express to you people how much of a fuck I don't give about this psychotic hole's 5000th return to internet broadcasting.  Good for her and godspeed.  I can't be bothered.

And why do you think he scrubbed his youtube personal account?

And why did Sofia alert that he was doing so to the forum(s) as well?

I hope you're aware that there is forthcoming legal action from Heather for these stalker forums being used to deprive her of her right to work, right to make a living in her field of choice.

MV knows it. And that's whey he went tits up like a bitch hound under a porch and began the scrubbing.

But no amount of scrubbing will ever erase the archived data proving that Ballgrab is (and has been for 2 years) a forum dedicated and encouraged by its founder and one Heidi Grady of Oxfordshire, UK to gangstalk and harass one Heather Wade from the airwaves - period.

Of this there is NO denial, just none.

Anyone who heard Vandeven deep into the cups during the Drunkcast, nearly to tears, bemoaning the intolerable hubris of Heather not publicly tributing Ballgrab as her stepping stone to fame, mediocrity, and subsequent institutionalized abuse knows as much.

Damnit Azz, even if you are intending to confound the coward VC and stick up for her, your presence on this cast only increases its visibility, and that serves to benefit no one but the churlishly butthurt MV and the shockingly obsessive stalker Heidi Grady in their pogrom of hatred.

Quote
VC
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #19054 on: Yesterday at 05:38:34 AM »
Quote from: Lilith on Yesterday at 02:59:26 AM
Yup, no VC, bummer.

"I'll Be Back..."

...if Heather goes on about her AB alleged suicide BS again.

And Heater's already on imaginary air grifting before doing any new shows... "Never miss a show?" Soooo, true! LOL...

 
*

Maybe she is still getting ready for Halloween 2020?

Only Azzerae and Metron are her biggest witchy bitchy fans remaining, since her Jedi lover is really always trolling her in jest. They should do a threesome podcast together. :D

How can you willingly make DeCON's day?

Quote
username
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #19049 on: Yesterday at 01:03:55 AM »
Quote from: Liberace! on February 16, 2020, 10:19:55 PM
It was until it was learned VC wasn't going to host.

Someone needs to step up.

And that "someone" is YOU?!?!??

Karmic deficit-land Azz, one more stain to wash off in due time. :-\ :'(






Re: The GabCast
« Reply #107 on: February 18, 2020, 10:52:05 pm »
I thought she had her own podcast. Why is she shitting up the gabcast with her Wadetism? What happened to shrader?

Re: The GabCast
« Reply #108 on: February 18, 2020, 11:00:30 pm »
You cant scrub youtube videos/facebook posts/screencaps/saved videos.  Im no lawyer but if it comes to a  Inyoung You/Michelle Carter-type scenario theyre all fuct

Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #109 on: February 18, 2020, 11:38:58 pm »
I thought she had her own podcast. Why is she shitting up the gabcast with her Wadetism? What happened to shrader?

Oh that...the  quirky, but sporadic "little podcast that did", well...

Apparently after first Pony Boy Sunset and then purported IP address acid washer wr250 bailed, so too did Aquarius - the bully culture of Hellgab no longer resolvable within her benevolent world view.

From there it was just a short Bart-punchdown for Heidi and her Heather-hatred to be, oh shall we say..."inconvenient" to Keef...in his efforts to crush all competing paranormal live-streamers.

https://lptd.home.blog

Heidi's been on sabbatical for a good 6 months now...

Quote
DynamoHum
Hall Of Famer
Ellevated
******
 
Posts: 7689
Karma: 1374
Don’t tell me if anyone dies, k?

Re: The Little Podcast That Did
« Reply #920 on: January 19, 2020, 02:06:00 AM »
Quote from: EarthAlien007 on January 18, 2020, 08:23:05 AM
Aquarius didn't deserve to be brought into that shit. She is a peace maker.

Hopefully @DynamoHum will be back soon.


I am thinking carefully about this.
Give pees a chance.

Coprophilia is shitty.
TigerLily
Official Muse
Ellightened
******
 
Posts: 4969
Karma: 1415
Founder Art's Tarts and Legacy Bart's Bitchen Babe

Re: The Little Podcast That Did
« Reply #921 on: January 19, 2020, 09:30:56 AM »
Quote from: DynamoHum on January 19, 2020, 02:06:00 AM
I am thinking carefully about this.

You're a cool chick. Some unasked for advice: Move on from picking on people who have moved on. Use that steely wit for good, not evil
Follow me into the endless night. Meet me in the woods tonight - Lord Huron. And TigerLily

<gag!>

 >:(

That place is losing traction (and members) like a set of discount recaps in an ice storm...


Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #110 on: February 18, 2020, 11:55:50 pm »
You cant scrub youtube videos/facebook posts/screencaps/saved videos.  Im no lawyer but if it comes to a  Inyoung You/Michelle Carter-type scenario theyre all fuct

Right you are - everything that was ever out there is all stored in the servers at Bluffdale, and elsewhere.

Here's a Groyp-alert from our Action Northwest Bully News Department:

https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9.61.260

Quote
RCW 9.61.260

Cyberstalking.

(1) A person is guilty of cyberstalking if he or she, with intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass any other person, and under circumstances not constituting telephone harassment, makes an electronic communication to such other person or a third party:
(a) Using any lewd, lascivious, indecent, or obscene words, images, or language, or suggesting the commission of any lewd or lascivious act;
(b) Anonymously or repeatedly whether or not conversation occurs; or
(c) Threatening to inflict injury on the person or property of the person called or any member of his or her family or household.
(2) Cyberstalking is a gross misdemeanor, except as provided in subsection (3) of this section.
(3) Cyberstalking is a class C felony if either of the following applies:
(a) The perpetrator has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment, as defined in RCW 9A.46.060, with the same victim or a member of the victim's family or household or any person specifically named in a no-contact order or no-harassment order in this or any other state; or
(b) The perpetrator engages in the behavior prohibited under subsection (1)(c) of this section by threatening to kill the person threatened or any other person.
(4) Any offense committed under this section may be deemed to have been committed either at the place from which the communication was made or at the place where the communication was received.
(5) For purposes of this section, "electronic communication" means the transmission of information by wire, radio, optical cable, electromagnetic, or other similar means. "Electronic communication" includes, but is not limited to, electronic mail, internet-based communications, pager service, and electronic text messaging.
[ 2004 c 94 § 1.]
NOTES:

Severability—2004 c 94: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 2004 c 94 § 6.]
Effective dates—2004 c 94: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect immediately [March 24, 2004], except for section 3 of this act, which takes effect July 1, 2004." [ 2004 c 94 § 7.]

Gee...wither "Heather my baby" and Richard's unsolicited radio call-in advice to Heather that if a peeping Tom is outside her window she should grab the Glock and "let it fly"...

Oh and the suddenly "I'm not playing this Heather game anymore" MV????

 :o

https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/cyberbullying-missouri.htm

Quote
Missouri law broadly defines the crime of stalking. A person commits stalking by, through a course of conduct, intentionally harassing another person or by following another person with the intent of harassing that person. Although this definition on its face may not appear to include cyberbullying within the meaning of the crime, the stalking statute contains definitions of several of the phrases used within the crime’s definition, revealing the broad scope of the statute.

The law defines a course of conduct as two or more acts over a period of time that show a continuity of purpose. The acts can include any type of communication, and it does not matter how brief the period of time may be during which the conduct occurs.

Harassing refers to a course of conduct directed at a specific person that serves no legitimate purpose. To constitute harassing activity, the course of conduct must be such that a reasonable person would be frightened, intimidated, or emotionally distressed under the circumstances. Therefore, a cyberbullying incident where one person leaves several messages on a coworker’s online profile, threatening to beat up the coworker next time they cross paths, may constitute stalking. Because it does not matter how short the period over which the threats are made, two threatening messages posted within minutes of each other may result in the person making the threats being charged and convicted of stalking.
(Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.225)

Harassment

Under Missouri law, a person commits the crime of harassment if he or she:
frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to another person by communicating to that person a threat to commit any felony
makes another person reasonably fear receiving physical contact or harm by using coarse language that would offend an average person
intentionally frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to another person by making an anonymous telephone call or sending any type of electronic communication
intentionally communicates with another person who is or claims to be 17 or younger, and in doing so recklessly frightens, intimidates, or causes emotional distress to the other person without good cause, orwithout good cause, commits any other act for the purpose of frightening, intimidating, or causing emotional distress to another person, and in doing so causes the other person to feel frightened, intimidated, or emotionally distressed (the victim’s response to the act must be reasonable for a person of that age).
For example, a person who uses social media to frighten another person with violent threats has likely committed harassment.
Punishment for Harassment

Harassment is a Class A misdemeanor unless the defendant is 21 years of age or older and the victim is 17 or younger, or the defendant has a prior conviction for harassment. In either of those scenarios, the new harassment conviction is a Class D felony.
(Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.090)

Yeah, I think it was really "smart" for MV to call off his publicly advertised STALKER Gabcast for 02-22-20, timed to destroy Heather just 2 short days before her announced return to the airwaves on the 24th.

I also think that Heather has an open/shut case to permanently shutter Ballgrab and enjoin any and all of its members (as jointly and severally liable) from continuing to deprive her of her right to make a living as a live streaming radio talk show host.

Moreover I ENCOURAGE her to use the full weight and authority of the law to shut Michael Vandeven and his cyberbullying "forum" DOWN, once and for all.

So mote it be.

 >:( >:( >:(






Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #111 on: February 19, 2020, 12:06:14 am »
Oh and For Heidi's edification:

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/stalking-and-harassment

Quote
Section 2 offence - Harassment
The elements of section 2 offence are:

a course of conduct;
which amounts to harassment of another; and
which the defendant knows, or ought to know amounts to harassment of another.

Prosecutors should also note section 1(1A), as inserted by section 125(2) of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA):

The elements of section 1(1A) offence are:

a course of conduct;
which involves harassment of two or more persons; and
which the defendant knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons;
by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above);
not to do something that he is entitled or required to do; or
to do something that he is not under any obligation to do.
 
As a summary only offence, the section 2 offence requires information or a complaint to be laid within 6 months from the time when the offence was committed, or the matter of complaint arose. The 6 months' limitation should run from the last date of the course of conduct alleged.

In determining whether the defendant ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment, the question to be considered is whether a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.[

Definition of stalking
Stalking is not legally defined but section 2A (3) of the PHA 1997 lists a number of examples of behaviours associated with stalking. The list is not an exhaustive one but gives an indication of the types of behaviour that may be displayed in a stalking offence. The listed behaviours are:

(a) following a person,
(b) contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means,
(c) publishing any statement or other material relating or purporting to relate to a person, or purporting to originate from a person,
(d) monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,
(e) loitering in any place (whether public or private),
(f) interfering with any property in the possession of a person,
(g) watching or spying on a person.

Harassment that includes one or more of the above features is not automatically stalking. The course of conduct, assessed in the round, must fit the generally received interpretation of the word 'stalking'.

Prosecutors should note that the list in s.2A(3) is not exhaustive and it will be open to courts to consider other acts by a defendant and conclude that those acts constitute stalking even if they are not on the s.2A(3) list. It is likely that the defence may argue particular acts "associated with stalking" should not be classed as stalking but harassment and that their client is guilty of harassment, not stalking. Where such an argument is raised, prosecutors should state that this should be a decision of fact for the magistrates to decide on. It is therefore imperative that the correct charge is laid from the outset. Section 2A is a summary offence and a person guilty of the offence of stalking is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or a fine.

As a summary only offence, the section 2A offence requires an information or complaint to be laid within 6 months from the time when the offence was committed, or the matter of complaint arose. The 6 months' limitation should run from the last date of the course of conduct alleged.

Prosecutors should note that an integral part of the stalking offence is establishing that harassment has taken place. In determining whether the defendant ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment, the question to be considered is whether a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.

Cyber stalking
Harassment can take place on the internet and through the misuse of email. This is sometimes known as 'cyberstalking'. This can include the use of social networking sites, chat rooms and other forums facilitated by technology. The internet can be used for a range of purposes relating to harassment, for example:

to locate personal information about a victim;
to communicate with the victim;
as a means of surveillance of the victim;
identity theft such as subscribing the victim to services, purchasing goods and services in their name;
damaging the reputation of the victim;
electronic sabotage such as spamming and sending viruses; or
tricking other internet users into harassing or threatening a victim.


Oh boy Heidi Hateful, your stalker bag is chock full of indictments waiting to happen, innit Missy?

 >:( >:( >:(

Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #112 on: February 19, 2020, 12:12:29 am »

Sofia
Elluminati
******
 
Posts: 2317
Karma: 175

Re: MV Sucks!!
« Reply #88 on: February 16, 2020, 08:56:49 PM »
Liberace spent Valentine's Day purging his server.  Didn't even pretend to be on a date.  Hmmm.





 :o :o :o

Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #113 on: February 19, 2020, 12:19:03 am »
GUILTY!
Quote
Liberace!
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18982 on: February 06, 2020, 06:14:37 PM »
Quote from: VC on February 06, 2020, 06:04:33 PM
I will take you up on your offer if Heater does more commentary about her alleged AB suicide, otherwise we'll all be experiencing another ghosting after her typical dumpster fires and no shows. No need to comment further about her sprained left foot/toes AWOL adventures. Too repetitive and boring at this point.

Ok, we'll see how things go with her show and get you on the GabCast when you think the time is right.

DynamoHum, looks like it's you and me. Pick a date and we'll plan it. I'd like it to be just prior to her return.
VC
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18983 on: February 06, 2020, 06:19:53 PM »
Quote from: DynamoHum on February 06, 2020, 03:00:40 PM
Was the trademark evidence she submitted ever posted here?

It’s stuff she sent to back up her trademark appeal so not doxxing as it’s available to the public.

I think Brig or PP or ? posted the screenshots from her KoN website if that's what you're referring to.
DynamoHum
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18984 on: February 06, 2020, 07:03:15 PM »
Quote from: Liberace! on February 06, 2020, 06:14:37 PM
Ok, we'll see how things go with her show and get you on the GabCast when you think the time is right.

DynamoHum, looks like it's you and me. Pick a date and we'll plan it. I'd like it to be just prior to her return.

I’ll drop you a line through the aether.
Lilith
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18985 on: February 07, 2020, 07:06:54 AM »
Quote from: VC on February 06, 2020, 06:19:53 PM
I think Brig or PP or ? posted the screenshots from her KoN website if that's what you're referring to.




Here is a fresh screenshot with the same schedule still appearing on her website even as I post this.
Lilith
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18986 on: February 07, 2020, 07:11:08 AM »
Quote from: VC on February 06, 2020, 06:04:33 PM
Thanks Liberace! I will take you up on your offer if Heater does more commentary about her alleged AB suicide, otherwise we'll all be experiencing another ghosting after her typical dumpster fires and no shows. No need to comment further about her sprained left foot/toes AWOL adventures. Too repetitive and boring at this point.

Though, if Heater did a real Open Lines without her Closed Circle of Friends, then I would call-in to her show sometime. If her gay Vegas Tony is now her producer, then we know how fucked-up that's going to be for guests. I just don't see how she's going to turn around from her former track record. She never understood AB's show format AND interview style and techniques, and her methods has always been cheerleader dumpster fires. A totally gullible suck-up or also, rarely, getting angry and/or cutting off untouchable subjects a guest/caller wants to discuss.

I don't hold-out any hope for Heater to admit her falsehoods and mistakes and will continue being a gullible suck-up, therefore no redemption or ability to change into a captivating AB style. Just another dumpster fire to behold...

You know, the definition of insanity...




Expand Quote

Excuses, excuses.  I can't think of  a better review of HW history that could be had, other than through a discussion between you and Dynamo Hum on a gabcast.
Lilith
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18987 on: February 07, 2020, 07:14:29 AM »
Quote from: DynamoHum on February 06, 2020, 07:03:15 PM
I’ll drop you a line through the aether.

Praise MV!  :D



Metron

  • ||*~the propinquity of moving electrons~*||
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #114 on: February 19, 2020, 12:23:32 am »

Liberace!
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #18999 on: February 07, 2020, 06:23:48 PM »
The special edition pre-Heather extravaganza broadcast of The GabCast will he Feb. 22 at midnight East, 9PM West. DynamoHum and Azzerae will host with me.
ItsOver
 
Kingdom of Nye With Heather Wade
« Reply #19000 on: February 07, 2020, 06:50:38 PM »
Quote from: Lilith on February 07, 2020, 06:10:50 PM
Since when has MV ever kept a GabCast on topic? ...
Praise Lee.  Praise tequila.





Re: The GabCast
« Reply #115 on: February 19, 2020, 01:48:58 am »
Why cant she do a podcast of her own? Why does she need a helper to do all the tech work? Is it boomer-tier computer savvy? A useful idiot to share the blame with if the SHTF? A little bit of both Id guess

I kind of feel bad for MV. When Vara tied his real life identity to BG, any career in radio/podcasting/yt bux was ended before it began.  Any traction and the cancel types would have a field day

Maybe the Gabcast was an elaborate troll on VC

AZZERAE

  • FOLLOW YOUR OWN STAR
Re: The GabCast
« Reply #116 on: February 19, 2020, 09:54:20 am »
The GabCast has officially been called off.