Author Topic: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)  (Read 15854 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2370 on: May 18, 2020, 08:12:25 pm »
Yikes, the frog king has been Groypered!

 ;D

Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2371 on: May 18, 2020, 08:20:07 pm »
I will get to these today, but please give some thought to my discussion of the Archons. It is my feeling that the battle you're yet facing directly involves these beings. I'll have more to say in that later, but your rapid shift from Mind Crawlrs into that caffeine-driven podcast now seems to me to have been quite predictable. Something(s) want you to keep being a loosh factory is my sense of things. The penile consumption story and the Marilyn Manson retelling are indicative, I believe, of dark entities invading your consciousness.

 :-\

I will read up on the Archons post one mo gen. Hey bro, u scarin me. Very possible Devils are dancing in my head.

I hope another quittening doesn't occur after you listen to this Glass House show. I may have been a bit rough on you, unintentionally. Apologies in advance.

I guess what I'm trying to say in summation is:


Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2372 on: May 18, 2020, 09:06:04 pm »
Ut oh...tnx for the heads up...we have got to stop sparking off each other before another conflagration ensues!

Crikey, I might need to bring Decon back in here to act as a proxy... ::)


Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2373 on: May 18, 2020, 09:14:08 pm »

Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2374 on: May 18, 2020, 09:59:39 pm »
Shards of a Glass House

Part One -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y22ICLr_Oo

Song About a Turtle (Because I Have No Girls to Write About)

I concur, Groyper looks more and more to be an incel, and this coterie of tittering yong cat ladies he has attracted with his simpering, say-nothing youtube streams, as well as the invisible wife all point to that conclusion.



In fact he LIVES for female drama, he assiduously searches it out and works it until it's spent or the given target nukes their channel. I think he's turned ErrinF 's feed on and off at least a dozen times this year alone!

He's largely the Chad incel, and you're not wrong, the far right/racism outrage act is just that ftmp, an act.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riNlesLyQFs

So how does that action jibe with his action figure war veteran persona? Did he lose his nuts to an IED in Iraq?



Now as to your claims of being a liberal - this week/month/year - uh...I see more hot Rushy windshield wiper action:



That's not to say that liberals are not "dangerous" - of course they are! That is where fascism has always flourished and resided from the early 1900s and evil eugenecist Margaret Sanger to this day's Antifa/head-cracking nazi-styled thuggery. It's liberals who can muster and marinate themselves in self-righteous emotion and then take everyones' rights away with nary a thought.



It's liberal Gov. Cuomo of NYC placing infected COVID patients in nursing homes and killing off the elderly...

It's liberal Gov Whitmer of MI playing cruel lockdown fascist and banning garden centers and paint and so on by whim, not science...

It's liberal Gov. Insleee of WA trying to implement a sign in sheet to the state at every restaurant so customers can be contact traced ad nauseum...

It's liberal Gov Newsom of CA and his lockdowns without end....


Soooo....you have to ask yourself one thing when you apply a broad stroke definition to yourself like "liberal"....how comfortable are you with your fellow travelers or would you prefer (as I do) to take cafeteria based approach to which political and social positions you endorse? More and more my polarity centers over "libertarian" as opposed to doctrinal conservative.



Try it, you might like it. ;)




Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2375 on: May 18, 2020, 10:24:36 pm »
Part Two-

The young frog king:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpRyw5JsF24

...sans beard...lol...

Back to Ballgrab, seriously man?!?!?!



I did not "go after" Spooky, I simply kept asking her what she gets from the bullying culture on the twin gabs and she was unable to answer, unwilling to dialog, and left in a huff. The posts are here, feel free to quote me if you wish. It was only recently that I found out that she's on psychiatric meds and has her own issues with depression, so... Trust me Azz, if I "go after" someone I do so with a heavy hammer, not a velvet glove...



So what has Trump done that's "too far" - be specific please!

You think we have any other "saviors" in this deep state swamp of a nation we're now cursed with? Yes Bernie took a dive, for the second time.

So Trump's allegedly "not fit" to be President - delineate precisely why and use facts, not rhetorical slop, which is what I'm hearing now.

As for my surly side, do you think I've some mandate to be perfect? LOL! It beggars naïveté for you to rip on me for being imperfect whilst you yo yo between political and emotional polarities. Please nibba, please...Christ with a crutch I'm not...Remember whey YOU threatened to close this whole forum?  :o

My political arguments are always rational, that's why I tend to win them.

Again..."not fit"?

Is senile Biden "fitter"?

How about Satanic Shrillary the killer?

Fauxcahontas the race liar?

Rather a dishonorable bench there, innit?

As for "snapping out of it" nationally - you suggest  perhaps revolution? I mean do you have a methodology in mind by which we might find what you deem a "more fit" President and moreover do you also have the hubris as an non-American to offer a short list we might chew over together?

I'm sorry, my anger at any of this just went as wet as smoldering campfire as you've neither the means, ammunition, not apparent wit to engage me on point politically, so frankly you're left with my...



Btw, not that reason matters at this stage of the goading, but I DO have my eyes closely on Trump and have since the get go.

I use real metrics like the economy, the unwinding of Obama's strangling administrative state, the appointment of Constitutionally sound Judges, just so many hard, tangible factors to make my calls from and thus to engage in a topical slap fight with you is simply a profound waste of time.



If you need correction I can always supply it, but you my friend will have to step up your critiques from tantrum to tautology, at the bare minuimum.

Peace/out. ::)



Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2376 on: May 18, 2020, 10:29:39 pm »



AZZERAE'S WORLD 76
« Reply #2377 on: May 23, 2020, 02:07:04 pm »

Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2378 on: May 24, 2020, 09:15:35 pm »
sigil i -

Timely disclaimer, lol...but the "best president" of the modern era was Reagan, imho...all Trump does is play "dumb" when the alien question is posed...



https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jan/06/woman-rebel-margaret-sanger-review

Quote
But while Bagge is clearly on Sanger's side, admiring of her pluck, determination and wildness (she had an open second marriage, counted HG Wells among her lovers and continued to enjoy a sex life well into old age), he acknowledges that she could be disagreeable, selfish and glory-seeking. This is important, for it was surely her flaws just as much as her virtues that kept her going when the struggle to make birth control legal seemed as though it would never be won.

Like so many humans good with bad - but a lot of death as the dividend.



http://www.blackgenocide.org/sanger.html

Quote
At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spoke of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

Blaming Families

Sanger's obsession with eugenics can be traced back to her own family. One of 11 children, she wrote in the autobiographical book, My Fight for Birth Control, that "I associated poverty, toil, unemployment, drunkenness, cruelty, quarreling, fighting, debts, jails with large families." Just as important was the impression in her childhood of an inferior family status, exacerbated by the iconoclastic, "free-thinking" views of her father, whose "anti-Catholic attitudes did not make for his popularity" in a predominantly Irish community.

The fact that the wealthy families in her hometown of Corning, N.Y., had relatively few children, Sanger took as prima facie evidence of the impoverishing effect of larger families. The personal impact of this belief was heightened 1899, at the age of 48. Sanger was convinced that the "ordeals of motherhood" had caused the death of her mother. The lingering consumption (tuberculosis) that took her mother's life visited Sanger at the birth of her own first child on Nov. 18, 1905. The diagnosis forced her to seek refuge in the Adirondacks to strengthen her for the impending birth. Despite the precautions, the birth of baby Grant was "agonizing," the mere memory of which Sanger described as "mental torture" more than 25 years later. She once described the experience as a factor "to be reckoned with" in her zealous campaign for birth control.




Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2379 on: May 24, 2020, 10:15:31 pm »
sigil ii -

Spooky's malady was BPD then - so noted... Sorry, I've no archive powers back there in Hellgab.

I wouldn't dispute that Trump's propensity to lampoon his enemies may be indicative of emotional instability, but I also would submit that he has used bombast to great effect in his career(s) and as such unlearning that trick at this stage of the game is unlikely. 

I would also note that both women went after him first:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/history-donald-trump-megyn-kelly-feud/story?id=36526503

Quote
The feud between Trump and Kelly started Aug. 6, 2015, at the first Republican presidential debate, when the two had a contentious back-and-forth.

In a question directed at Trump, Kelly said, “You’ve called women you don’t like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.”

Trump fired back on Twitter after the debate.


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
 Wow, @megynkelly really bombed tonight. People are going wild on twitter! Funny to watch.

3,695
1:40 AM - Aug 7, 2015 · Manhattan, NY
Twitter Ads info and privacy

2,180 people are talking about this

But it didn’t end there.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/aug/10/omarosa-who-is-the-former-trump-aide-turned-leading-detractor

Quote
Omarosa Manigault Newman, who attacks the president in a brutal memoir, rose to prominence on The Apprentice and reportedly fell out with John Kelly

The reality TV villain turned White House official – once arguably Donald Trump’s most prominent African American supporter – is now herself both critic and detractor in her brutal new memoir. Manigault Newman is apparently seeking some revenge of her own.

https://www.thewrap.com/trump-slams-omarosa-lowlife-video/

Quote
According to excerpts obtained by The Guardian, Manigault-Newman’s book includes passages in which she calls Trump a “racist,” who has used the “N-word” repeatedly. She also wrote that there are tapes to prove that the president was caught on mic saying the racial slur on his former NBC reality show, “The Apprentice.” She cited three unnamed sources.

She went on to write that she felt a “growing realization that Trump was indeed a racist, a bigot and a misogynist. “My certainty about the N-word tape and his frequent uses of that word were the top of a high mountain of truly appalling things I’d experienced with him, during the last two years in particular,” she wrote.

And let's be real here, without Trump, she was resoundingly low profile. Biting the hand that feeds one rarely wins a return engagement. She cashiered out with a spite book, and spite she earned in return.

I consider any of these tempests in teapots to be of the lowest signficance in grading the results of his actual policies and accomplishments, to the archive of which I remand you yet again:

http://www.magapill.com

(many times more actual accomplishments than any president in a similar time frame)

Draining the swamp that began filling under Woodrow Wilson over 100 years ago means whacking a lot of alligators, on both sides of the water. His campaign rhetoric also caricatured his "fellow Republican" candidates and likely saved us from (God hellp us all) another Bushy, this time the "sleepy" one. And frankly it took that level of mudslinging to break the false camaraderie charade that pols play before kissing and making up with our dollars and our civil rights as their prize. None before Trump has ever attempted a full on national "wakey wakey" and I love that he did!



We've been down the disinfectant trail before and as I proved the science stands on his side, regardless of whether he had an open mic moment. Please consider that an offhand remark can and will compel the TDS crowd as well as fact checkers like myself to arrive at precisely the same conclusion - LED UV lung treatment is for reals, and atomization of a disinfectant like hydrogen peroxide is proven efficacious. Iow, he was able to seed knowledge without being slammed for picking winners or losers by even mentioning Aytu by name.

A delicate bit of chess.



The proposed forum closure - twas early on when you were still performing a straddle betwixt here and Ballgrab, Toots went nutso in email and Opti was almost in tears.



And my sincere thanks for letting me be your forum political know it all bitch amigo! ;)

I think we're agreeing on the decouple between defined liberalism and what it's been politically repackaged as, to the actual detriment of human rights.

I've no more quitennings...sorry...peace/out - just means that - peace (as in no enmity) and out (as in said my piece)...
















AZZERAE'S WORLD 77
« Reply #2380 on: May 25, 2020, 09:51:12 am »
THE DEMONS WITHIN

sigil i
sigil ii

Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2381 on: May 25, 2020, 06:48:33 pm »
77 sigil i -

Imagine, a man you could troll with a tweet somehow manages NOT to be the one to press the red button...oh Shrillary...you wanted to end us all so badly... :-\



Hello caffeine, your old friend...be moderate amigo, please be moderate... 8)



https://scarenormal.com/what-is-a-loosh-energy-farm/

Quote
Since the beginning of human history, humans have been enslaved by an unseen force called the Archons. These beings love to cause human suffering.

What is a Loosh Energy Farm? A Loosh Energy Farm is a spiritual energy farm built on the astral plane to harvest energy from the dead or suffering of any living creature (mainly humans) on Earth. The energy is then harvested by trans-dimensional beings.

Upon the death of a human or a living creature, these beings will then feed on their life energy to extend their lifespan. When we suffer life force energy is spewed from our bodies, and the tastier the energy meal for our creators.

Origins of Loosh Energy Farm

Loosh Energy Farm was founded by Robert Monroe, who was an expert in astral travel. He said he used “Matrix Glitches” glitches in our planet and reality to have interactions and explore other worlds and dimensions.

Monroe claims that he has more than 1000 travels and contacts with other dimensions and he was doing that for more than a decade. In one of his journeys to another dimension he discovered something sinister.

In the last months of his life he came out with the theory that planet earth is a big energy (loosh) farm, Humans represent live stocks that produce loosh when they die. All planets are under the control of the beings named “The Archons” They are feeding and assimilating energy that the human body releases when humans die.

The American people are flip-floppers, you can say that and be authoritative. It has generally served us well when we maintained the framers "checks and balances" but increasingly those are being purchased away, traded for control, marketed to our enemies. Ergo the old dualism back and forth model is frankly on the verge of systemic collapse. And that will in due time usher in anarchy.:


You however are  a LOT better than the DeCON troll, who is a nasty, backstabbing, duplicitous piece of work. It cares for nothing and no one but itself; you sir are in no way born of that mold!


Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2382 on: May 25, 2020, 07:22:31 pm »
77 sigil ii-

The virus itself is a bioweapon, unquestionably, and in a cynically timely manner released upon the world, at a time when the only leader to question China's hollowing out of the planet was...Trump...

Trump IS the last hope here, whether you believe it or not.

Electing a senile Dem candidate on the promise that his female arm candy will step right in and run the deep state ball is cynicism defined.

That you are unable to articulate a suitable replacement or comparable candidate from the right of substantively beneficial policies confirms as much. Of the candidates Trump faced in the last Republican primary most were shown to be traitors to their party principles or supplicants to the deep (administrative) state that infests our nation's power structure yet:


Bush - illuminati deep state.
Carson - trustworthy HUD sec'y
Christie - destroyed by media in phony "bridge-gate" scandal
Cruz - angling for SCOTUS, satisfied with the Senate
Fiorina - collapsed then mighty HP with bad governance
Graham - bloodthirsty warmonger
Huckabee - faith based and not much else
Jindal - who???
Kasich - unprincipled gun-grabbing traitor!
Pataki - has-been NY RINO
Paul - THE REAL DEAL!
Perry - energy insider at ETP
Rubio - Cuber's Mitt Romney?
Santorum - off the charts now, faith-based enough to be ignored
Walker - lost to a Dem Gov - history

There's the future of anything if Trump taps out - it's still down to one man - Rand Paul. Now please let's dispense with this prattle about the unlikelihood of a single person being a savior. It took but one Trojan Horse to bring America to its knees, so also can one dedicated patriot lever us back to liberty!

Problems...moi???

Oh you kid!

But to your point, I've had interactions in my life with both sides, the dark and then the light. Ergo I am well aware of when I need to step up my prayer and return to home base. I will give some thought to bagging the device bondage before sleep - maybe I simply reverse my reading time with my listening time. Shake the schedule up! Good advice Azz. 8)

But you really should get over the "liberal" label perception of dissonance you're trading in of late. It's no bad thing to be liberal of thought, as I analyzed for you in a prior post:

marked by generosity : OPENHANDED
not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms 

It is in fact evidence of free thinking.


Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2383 on: May 25, 2020, 08:30:50 pm »
A total aside here Azz, I dig your new look - it's distinctly Deppish...in a good way... ;)





Re: AZZERAE'S WORLD (PODCAST DISCUSSION)
« Reply #2384 on: May 26, 2020, 03:54:22 pm »
A total aside here Azz, I dig your new look...

Thanks!